Connected business operations. Flexible deployment.
Learn how to design a robust parallel run strategy for ERP migrations. This guide covers data synchronization, reconciliation, risk mitigation, and go/no-go criteria to ensure a successful cutover.
A parallel run strategy involves operating both the legacy ERP system and the new target ERP system simultaneously for a defined period. This approach allows organizations to validate data integrity, business process accuracy, and system performance in a live production environment before fully committing to the cutover. The primary goal is to reduce migration risk by identifying discrepancies in financial reporting, operational workflows, and integration points while the legacy system remains the source of truth. This method is critical for complex migrations where data loss or process disruption could have significant financial or operational consequences. By running both systems in parallel, you can verify that the new system produces accurate results under real-world conditions, ensuring that the transition is smooth and that business continuity is maintained. The main risks to control during this phase include data synchronization errors, user confusion, increased operational costs, and potential performance bottlenecks in the new system. A well-designed parallel run strategy requires careful planning, clear communication, and rigorous reconciliation processes to ensure that the new system is ready for full production use.
Before initiating a parallel run, it is essential to define the scope and objectives of the validation period. This includes identifying which business processes, modules, and data sets will be included in the parallel run. Not all processes may need to be validated simultaneously; a phased approach can help manage complexity and resource allocation. The objectives should be specific, measurable, and aligned with the overall migration goals. For example, if the primary concern is financial accuracy, the parallel run should focus on general ledger, accounts payable, and accounts receivable modules. If operational efficiency is the priority, focus on inventory management, order processing, and supply chain modules. Defining the scope also involves determining the duration of the parallel run, which can range from a few weeks to several months, depending on the complexity of the migration and the criticality of the processes involved. It is important to establish clear success criteria and go/no-go metrics that will be used to evaluate the performance of the new system during the parallel run. These criteria should be agreed upon by all stakeholders, including IT, finance, operations, and executive leadership, to ensure that there is a shared understanding of what constitutes a successful validation.
A successful parallel run requires the involvement of key stakeholders from various departments. The project manager should oversee the overall process, ensuring that all activities are aligned with the migration plan. IT staff should be responsible for technical aspects, such as data synchronization, system configuration, and performance monitoring. Finance and operations teams should be involved in validating business processes and reconciling data. Executive leadership should provide support and make final decisions based on the results of the parallel run. Clear roles and responsibilities should be defined for each stakeholder, including who is responsible for identifying and resolving discrepancies, who is responsible for reporting progress, and who is responsible for making go/no-go decisions. Regular communication and collaboration among stakeholders are essential to ensure that the parallel run is conducted smoothly and that any issues are addressed promptly.
The technical execution of a parallel run involves synchronizing data between the legacy and new ERP systems. This can be achieved through various methods, including batch processing, real-time integration, or manual data entry. The choice of method depends on the volume of data, the frequency of updates, and the requirements for data accuracy. Batch processing is suitable for large volumes of data that do not require real-time updates, while real-time integration is necessary for processes that require immediate data availability. Manual data entry should be avoided whenever possible, as it is prone to errors and can be time-consuming. Data synchronization should be designed to ensure that both systems have access to the same data, allowing for accurate comparison and reconciliation. Integration points between the new ERP system and other systems, such as CRM, e-commerce, and supply chain management, should also be tested during the parallel run to ensure that data flows correctly and that there are no disruptions in business processes. It is important to monitor the performance of the new system during the parallel run to identify any bottlenecks or issues that may arise under load. Performance testing should be conducted to ensure that the new system can handle the expected volume of transactions and users without degradation in performance.
Data mapping and transformation are critical components of the parallel run strategy. Data from the legacy system must be mapped to the corresponding fields in the new system to ensure that data is transferred accurately. This involves defining the mapping rules, which specify how data from the legacy system is transformed and loaded into the new system. Data transformation may involve changing data formats, converting data types, or aggregating data from multiple sources. It is important to test the data mapping and transformation rules thoroughly before the parallel run to ensure that data is transferred correctly. Any errors or discrepancies in the data mapping should be identified and resolved before the parallel run begins. Data quality issues, such as missing or incomplete data, should also be addressed during the preparation phase to ensure that the parallel run is conducted with accurate and complete data.
Validation is the core of the parallel run strategy. It involves comparing the results produced by the legacy and new ERP systems to identify any discrepancies. Reconciliation reports should be generated regularly to compare key financial and operational metrics, such as total sales, inventory levels, and accounts payable balances. Discrepancies should be analyzed to determine their root cause and whether they are due to data mapping errors, system configuration issues, or business process differences. It is important to establish a process for identifying, tracking, and resolving discrepancies. Discrepancies should be categorized by severity, with critical discrepancies requiring immediate attention and resolution. A discrepancy log should be maintained to track the status of each discrepancy and the actions taken to resolve it. Regular reviews of the discrepancy log should be conducted to ensure that all issues are being addressed promptly and that the new system is performing as expected. The goal of the validation phase is to ensure that the new system produces accurate and reliable results that are consistent with the legacy system.
In addition to data reconciliation, business process validation is essential to ensure that the new ERP system supports the organization's operational needs. This involves testing key business processes, such as order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, and record-to-report, to ensure that they function correctly in the new system. User acceptance testing (UAT) should be conducted to validate that the new system meets the requirements of end users. UAT should involve a representative sample of users from different departments and roles to ensure that the system is usable and effective for all users. Feedback from UAT should be collected and analyzed to identify any issues or areas for improvement. Business process validation should also include testing of exception handling and error recovery to ensure that the new system can handle unexpected situations without disrupting business operations. The results of business process validation should be documented and reviewed by stakeholders to ensure that the new system is ready for full production use.
Running two ERP systems simultaneously introduces several risks that must be managed carefully. Operational risks include increased workload for users, potential confusion between the two systems, and the possibility of data entry errors. Technical risks include data synchronization failures, system performance issues, and integration failures. To mitigate these risks, it is important to establish clear communication channels and provide training to users on how to use both systems during the parallel run. Users should be aware of which system is the source of truth and which system is being validated. Clear guidelines should be provided on how to handle discrepancies and how to report issues. Technical risks can be mitigated by implementing robust monitoring and alerting systems to detect and respond to issues in real time. Regular backups should be taken to ensure that data can be restored in the event of a failure. A rollback plan should be developed in case the new system fails to meet the success criteria during the parallel run. The rollback plan should outline the steps required to revert to the legacy system and ensure that business operations can continue without disruption.
Performance and security monitoring are critical components of the parallel run strategy. Performance monitoring involves tracking key metrics, such as response times, throughput, and resource utilization, to ensure that the new system is performing as expected. Performance issues should be identified and resolved before the cutover to avoid disruptions in business operations. Security monitoring involves ensuring that the new system is configured securely and that access controls are in place to protect sensitive data. Security audits should be conducted to identify any vulnerabilities or misconfigurations that could be exploited by attackers. Security issues should be addressed promptly to ensure that the new system is secure and compliant with regulatory requirements. Regular security reviews should be conducted throughout the parallel run to ensure that the system remains secure as it is used in production.
The deployment phase involves planning and executing the cutover from the legacy system to the new ERP system. Cutover planning should begin well in advance of the parallel run to ensure that all necessary steps are identified and scheduled. The cutover plan should include a detailed timeline, roles and responsibilities, communication plan, and rollback plan. The cutover window should be scheduled during a period of low business activity to minimize disruption. A freeze period should be implemented before the cutover to prevent changes to the legacy system that could affect the migration. The cutover should be executed according to the plan, with regular status updates provided to stakeholders. After the cutover, the new system should be monitored closely to ensure that it is functioning correctly and that there are no issues. Post-cutover support should be provided to address any issues that arise and to ensure that users are comfortable with the new system.
The go/no-go decision is a critical milestone in the ERP migration process. It should be based on the results of the parallel run and the achievement of predefined success criteria. Success criteria should include data accuracy, business process validation, performance benchmarks, and security compliance. A go/no-go committee, consisting of key stakeholders, should review the results of the parallel run and make the final decision. The decision should be based on objective data and should be documented. If the decision is to proceed with the cutover, the cutover plan should be executed. If the decision is to delay the cutover, the reasons for the delay should be documented, and a revised plan should be developed. The go/no-go decision should be communicated to all stakeholders to ensure that there is a shared understanding of the next steps.
The stabilization phase begins after the cutover and continues until the new ERP system is fully operational and stable. During this phase, the focus is on addressing any remaining issues, optimizing system performance, and supporting users as they adapt to the new system. Post-migration support should be provided to address user questions and resolve any issues that arise. A hypercare period, with increased support and monitoring, should be implemented immediately after the cutover to ensure that any issues are identified and resolved quickly. Performance tuning should be conducted to optimize the system for production use. User training and support should be provided to ensure that users are comfortable with the new system and can use it effectively. Regular reviews should be conducted to assess the performance of the new system and identify any areas for improvement. The stabilization phase is critical to ensuring that the new ERP system delivers the expected benefits and that the migration is considered a success.
Continuous improvement is an ongoing process that should be embedded in the post-migration phase. Feedback from users and stakeholders should be collected regularly to identify areas for improvement. This feedback should be analyzed and used to make changes to the system, processes, or configurations. Regular reviews of the system's performance and user satisfaction should be conducted to ensure that the system continues to meet the organization's needs. Continuous improvement should also involve monitoring industry trends and best practices to ensure that the system remains up to date and competitive. By embedding continuous improvement into the post-migration phase, organizations can ensure that their new ERP system continues to deliver value and supports their business goals.
Designing a parallel run strategy for ERP system validation is a critical step in ensuring a successful migration. By operating both the legacy and new systems simultaneously, organizations can validate data integrity, business process accuracy, and system performance in a live environment. This approach reduces migration risk and ensures that the new system is ready for full production use. A well-designed parallel run strategy requires careful planning, clear communication, and rigorous reconciliation processes. It involves defining the scope and objectives, executing data synchronization and integration, validating business processes, managing risks, planning and executing cutover, and providing post-migration support. By following these steps, organizations can ensure that their ERP migration is successful and that the new system delivers the expected benefits. The parallel run strategy is a powerful tool for reducing risk and ensuring business continuity during the transition to a new ERP system.
Common questions on this topic. Talk to our team for anything specific to your business.
The duration of an ERP parallel run depends on the complexity of the migration and the criticality of the processes involved. It can range from a few weeks to several months. A minimum of one full business cycle, including month-end or year-end closing, is recommended to validate financial reporting accuracy.
All data relevant to the business processes being validated should be synchronized. This typically includes master data (customers, vendors, items) and transactional data (orders, invoices, payments). The scope of data synchronization should be defined during the preparation phase.
Discrepancies should be logged, categorized by severity, and analyzed to determine their root cause. Critical discrepancies should be resolved immediately, while less severe discrepancies can be tracked and resolved over time. A discrepancy log should be maintained to track the status of each issue.
While not mandatory for all migrations, a parallel run is highly recommended for complex migrations or those involving critical business processes. It provides a valuable opportunity to validate the new system in a live environment and reduce migration risk.
Main risks include increased operational costs, user confusion, data synchronization errors, and potential performance bottlenecks. These risks can be mitigated through careful planning, clear communication, and robust monitoring.
Success is measured against predefined criteria, such as data accuracy, business process validation, performance benchmarks, and security compliance. A go/no-go committee should review the results and make the final decision based on objective data.
Discover how specific distribution ERP metrics bridge the gap between operational execution and financial health, enhancing fulfillment accuracy and optimizing working capital through data-driven visibility.
Learn how to structure manufacturing ERP reporting to bridge the gap between shop-floor operations and executive KPIs, ensuring data integrity and strategic alignment.
Learn how to systematically validate API endpoints, middleware, and data flows after migrating your ERP platform to ensure operational continuity and data integrity.
Discuss your workflows, modules and deployment options with our team.
Back to resources