Skip to content
ERP Migration

Planning for Data Archiving and Retention During ERP Migration

Learn how to plan data archiving and retention strategies to reduce risk, ensure compliance, and maintain performance during ERP migrations and upgrades.

8 min readSysGenPro Editorial
Planning for Data Archiving and Retention During ERP Migration

Direct Answer: The Core Strategy for Data Archiving and Retention

Planning for data archiving and retention during ERP migration involves identifying which historical data is legally required, operationally useful, or performance-dragging, and then systematically moving non-essential data to a secure archive before or during the migration. This approach reduces the volume of data to be migrated, lowers the risk of data corruption or loss, improves the performance of the new ERP system, and ensures compliance with regulatory retention laws. The primary risks to control include accidental deletion of legally mandated records, migration of corrupted or duplicate data that degrades system performance, and failure to establish a clear data ownership model that prevents future compliance gaps. By defining retention policies early, organizations can avoid the common pitfall of migrating decades of obsolete data, which often leads to slower system response times and higher storage costs in the new environment.

Phase 1: Assessment and Policy Definition

The first step in planning for data archiving and retention is a comprehensive assessment of the current data landscape. This phase requires collaboration between IT, legal, finance, and operations teams to define what data must be retained and for how long. Legal and compliance teams must identify regulatory requirements, such as tax laws, financial reporting standards, and industry-specific regulations that mandate the retention of specific records for defined periods. For example, financial transactions may need to be retained for seven years, while customer contact information may have different privacy laws governing its storage and deletion.

Data Profiling and Classification

Once retention policies are defined, the next step is to profile the existing data in the legacy ERP system. Data profiling involves analyzing the volume, quality, and structure of the data to identify duplicates, inconsistencies, and obsolete records. This process helps determine the actual amount of data that needs to be migrated versus the amount that can be archived or deleted. Data classification is also critical during this phase. Data should be categorized into tiers based on its value and usage frequency. Tier 1 data includes active records that are frequently accessed and must be migrated to the new ERP. Tier 2 data includes historical records that are rarely accessed but must be retained for compliance or reference purposes. Tier 3 data includes obsolete records that can be safely deleted or archived in a low-cost storage solution.

Phase 2: Data Cleansing and Preparation

Before any data is migrated or archived, it must be cleansed to ensure accuracy and consistency. Data cleansing involves removing duplicates, correcting errors, and standardizing formats. This step is crucial because migrating dirty data to a new ERP system can lead to significant operational issues, such as incorrect financial reports, failed integrations, and user frustration. Data cleansing should be performed in a controlled environment, with clear documentation of the changes made to each record. This documentation is essential for auditability and for resolving any discrepancies that may arise during the migration process.

Deduplication and Transformation

Deduplication is a key component of data cleansing. Legacy ERP systems often contain multiple records for the same customer, vendor, or product due to manual entry errors or system limitations. These duplicates must be identified and merged before migration. Data transformation is also necessary to ensure that the data conforms to the structure and requirements of the new ERP system. This may involve mapping fields from the legacy system to the new system, converting data types, and applying business rules. For example, if the legacy system uses a different currency format than the new system, the data must be transformed to match the new format. It is important to note that compatibility and support for specific data transformations must be verified against the vendor's official documentation for the exact source and target versions.

Phase 3: Archiving Strategy and Execution

Once the data has been profiled, classified, and cleansed, the archiving strategy can be executed. Archiving involves moving Tier 2 and Tier 3 data from the active ERP database to a secure, long-term storage solution. This can be done using various methods, such as exporting the data to a data warehouse, creating a separate archive database, or using cloud-based storage solutions. The choice of archiving method depends on the organization's specific needs, budget, and compliance requirements. It is important to ensure that the archived data remains accessible for the required retention period and that it can be retrieved quickly if needed.

Data TierDescriptionActionStorage LocationRetention Period
Tier 1Active, frequently accessed dataMigrate to new ERPNew ERP DatabaseIndefinite
Tier 2Historical, rarely accessed dataArchiveData Warehouse/Cloud7-10 Years
Tier 3Obsolete, no longer neededDelete or ArchiveSecure Deletion/Low-Cost StorageAs per Legal

Phase 4: Migration and Validation

With the data cleansed and archived, the migration of Tier 1 data to the new ERP system can begin. This phase involves transferring the active data from the legacy system to the new system using migration tools or scripts. It is essential to perform multiple trial migrations to identify and resolve any issues before the final cutover. During each trial migration, the data should be validated to ensure that it has been transferred accurately and completely. This validation process includes checking for data integrity, completeness, and consistency. Reconciliation reports should be generated to compare the data in the legacy system with the data in the new system. Any discrepancies must be investigated and resolved before proceeding to the next trial migration.

Reconciliation and Auditability

Reconciliation is a critical step in ensuring the success of the data migration. It involves comparing the total values of key data fields, such as financial balances, inventory quantities, and customer counts, between the legacy and new systems. This process helps identify any data loss or corruption that may have occurred during the migration. Auditability is also important, as it ensures that the migration process can be traced and verified. This includes keeping detailed logs of all data transformations, cleansing activities, and migration steps. These logs are essential for compliance audits and for resolving any disputes that may arise regarding the accuracy of the migrated data.

Phase 5: Cutover and Post-Migration Stabilization

The cutover phase is the final step in the migration process, where the new ERP system goes live and the legacy system is decommissioned. This phase requires careful planning and coordination to minimize downtime and ensure a smooth transition. A detailed cutover plan should be developed, outlining the steps to be taken, the roles and responsibilities of each team member, and the go/no-go criteria for proceeding with the cutover. The go/no-go decision should be based on the results of the final trial migration and validation. If any critical issues are identified, the cutover should be postponed until they are resolved.

  • Finalize data loads and verify integrity
  • Communicate cutover schedule to all stakeholders
  • Execute rollback plan if critical failures occur
  • Monitor system performance and user feedback
  • Conduct post-migration support and training

After the cutover, the post-migration stabilization phase begins. This phase involves monitoring the new ERP system for any issues, providing support to users, and making any necessary adjustments. It is also important to continue archiving and retaining data according to the established policies. Regular audits should be conducted to ensure that the data retention and archiving processes are being followed. This ongoing management is essential for maintaining compliance and ensuring the long-term success of the new ERP system.

Risk Management and Continuity

Planning for data archiving and retention during ERP migration involves managing several key risks. Data loss is a significant risk, as it can lead to compliance violations and operational disruptions. To mitigate this risk, verified backups should be taken before any data cleansing or migration activities. Restore tests should be performed to ensure that the backups are valid and can be restored if needed. Downtime is another risk, as it can impact business operations. To minimize downtime, the cutover should be planned during a period of low business activity, and a detailed rollback plan should be in place. Broken customizations and unsupported dependencies are also risks, as they can lead to system failures. To mitigate these risks, compatibility checks should be performed for all custom modules and integrations, and any issues should be resolved before the cutover.

Conclusion

Planning for data archiving and retention during ERP migration is a critical component of a successful migration project. By following a structured approach that includes assessment, policy definition, data cleansing, archiving, migration, validation, and post-migration stabilization, organizations can reduce risk, ensure compliance, and improve the performance of their new ERP system. It is essential to involve all relevant stakeholders, including IT, legal, finance, and operations, in the planning process to ensure that all requirements are met. By taking a proactive approach to data management, organizations can avoid the common pitfalls of ERP migration and achieve a smooth and successful transition to their new system.

Written by
SysGenPro Editorial

SysGenPro Editorial

Platform & solutions team

Practical guidance on ERP, AI automation, cloud deployment and enterprise transformation from the SysGenPro team.

Share this article

Frequently asked questions

Common questions on this topic. Talk to our team for anything specific to your business.

01How much historical data should be migrated to a new ERP?

Only data that is legally required, operationally useful, or performance-critical should be migrated. Historical data that is rarely accessed should be archived to improve system performance and reduce storage costs.

02What are the legal requirements for ERP data retention?

Legal requirements vary by industry and jurisdiction. Common requirements include retaining financial records for 7-10 years and customer data for the duration of the business relationship plus a specified period. Consult with legal counsel to determine specific requirements.

03How does data archiving improve ERP performance?

Data archiving reduces the volume of data in the active database, which improves query performance, reduces storage costs, and enhances system responsiveness. This is particularly important for large ERP systems with extensive historical data.

04When should data cleansing occur in an ERP migration?

Data cleansing should occur before the final data migration. It is recommended to perform cleansing in a controlled environment and validate the results before migrating the data to the new ERP system.

05What is the difference between data archiving and data deletion?

Data archiving involves moving data to a secure, long-term storage solution where it remains accessible for the required retention period. Data deletion involves permanently removing data from the system, which should only be done after ensuring that the data is no longer needed for compliance or operational purposes.

06How to ensure data integrity during ERP migration?

Data integrity can be ensured by performing multiple trial migrations, validating data accuracy and completeness, and generating reconciliation reports. Detailed logs of all data transformations and migration steps should be kept for auditability.

Continue learning
View all articles
Explore the platform

Where to go next

Browse the knowledge hub

See how SysGenPro fits your business

Discuss your workflows, modules and deployment options with our team.

Back to resources