Connected business operations. Flexible deployment.
A practical guide to executing parallel runs during ERP migration, focusing on data reconciliation, output validation, risk mitigation, and go-live criteria for business continuity.
A parallel run is a critical validation phase in ERP migration where the new system operates simultaneously with the legacy system, processing identical or representative business transactions. The primary objective is to validate that the new ERP produces accurate, reliable outputs that match the legacy system's baseline, thereby reducing the risk of data loss, financial discrepancies, and operational disruption during cutover. This approach is essential because it provides empirical evidence that the new system can handle real-world business processes before the legacy system is decommissioned. The main risks to control during this phase include data integrity failures, integration mismatches, performance bottlenecks, and user adoption gaps. By rigorously comparing outputs from both systems, organizations can identify and resolve defects in a controlled environment, ensuring that the transition to the new ERP is smooth and that business continuity is maintained. This validation step is not merely a technical exercise but a business assurance process that protects financial reporting accuracy and operational stability.
Successful parallel runs begin with meticulous preparation. The first step is to define the scope of the parallel run, determining which modules, business processes, and data sets will be included. Typically, core financial modules such as General Ledger, Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, and Inventory are prioritized due to their criticality to business operations and financial reporting. The baseline data from the legacy system must be thoroughly profiled and cleansed before migration to the new system. This involves identifying and resolving data quality issues such as duplicate records, missing fields, and inconsistent formatting. A clean baseline is essential for accurate comparison, as discrepancies arising from poor data quality in the legacy system can obscure genuine issues in the new system. Additionally, the staging environment for the new ERP must be configured to mirror the production environment as closely as possible, including hardware specifications, network configurations, and integration points. This parity ensures that performance and behavior observed during the parallel run are representative of the production environment.
Before initiating the parallel run, clear reconciliation criteria must be established. These criteria define what constitutes a successful match between the legacy and new system outputs. For financial data, this typically involves comparing trial balances, subledger balances, and key financial statements. For operational data, it may involve comparing inventory counts, order statuses, and shipment records. The tolerance for variance should be defined, with zero tolerance for critical financial figures and small, predefined tolerances for non-critical operational metrics. These criteria should be documented and agreed upon by all stakeholders, including finance, operations, and IT teams. Clear criteria prevent subjective interpretations of results and provide an objective basis for go/no-go decisions.
During the parallel run, both the legacy and new ERP systems process transactions in real-time or near-real-time. This can be achieved through several methods, including manual data entry into both systems, automated data replication from the legacy system to the new system, or a combination of both. The choice of method depends on the complexity of the business processes and the availability of integration tools. It is crucial to ensure that the data flows into the new system are consistent with the data processed in the legacy system. This includes maintaining the same transaction dates, user roles, and business rules. The parallel run should cover a representative period of business activity, typically spanning at least one full accounting cycle, to capture all relevant transactions and end-of-period processes. During this period, users should be trained to operate in the new system, providing valuable feedback on usability and functionality.
Continuous monitoring is essential during the parallel run to detect and address issues promptly. This includes monitoring system performance, data integrity, and user activity. Logging mechanisms should be in place to capture all transactions, errors, and system events in both the legacy and new systems. These logs serve as a critical source of information for troubleshooting and reconciliation. Automated monitoring tools can help identify anomalies and alert the project team to potential issues. Regular check-ins with key stakeholders should be scheduled to review progress, discuss challenges, and make necessary adjustments to the parallel run plan.
The validation phase involves systematically comparing the outputs of the new ERP system with those of the legacy system. This reconciliation process should be automated wherever possible to ensure accuracy and efficiency. Reconciliation reports should be generated for each module and business process, highlighting any discrepancies between the two systems. These discrepancies should be categorized by severity, with critical issues such as financial mismatches prioritized for immediate resolution. The root cause of each discrepancy should be investigated, determining whether it stems from data migration errors, configuration issues, integration failures, or differences in business logic. A defect management process should be established to track, assign, and resolve these issues. The goal is to achieve a high level of agreement between the two systems, with any remaining discrepancies being understood and accepted by the business.
| Module | Key Metrics | Tolerance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Ledger | Trial Balance | 0 | Match |
| Accounts Payable | Subledger Balance | 0 | Match |
| Accounts Receivable | Subledger Balance | 0 | Match |
| Inventory | Stock Counts | 1% | Review |
Parallel runs are not without risks. Data loss, system downtime, and integration failures can occur, potentially disrupting business operations. To mitigate these risks, robust backup and recovery procedures must be in place. Regular backups of both the legacy and new system databases should be performed, and restore tests should be conducted to ensure that backups are valid and can be restored in a timely manner. A rollback plan should be developed, outlining the steps to revert to the legacy system if the new system fails to meet the go-live criteria. This plan should include clear triggers for rollback, such as critical data discrepancies or system performance issues. Additionally, communication plans should be established to keep stakeholders informed of the parallel run status and any issues that arise. Proactive risk management helps ensure that the organization is prepared to handle unexpected challenges and maintain business continuity.
The decision to proceed with cutover should be based on objective criteria defined during the preparation phase. These criteria typically include the resolution of all critical defects, achievement of reconciliation targets, successful completion of user acceptance testing, and confirmation of system performance. A formal go/no-go meeting should be held with key stakeholders to review the parallel run results and make the final decision. The meeting should include a review of the reconciliation reports, defect log, and risk assessment. If the criteria are not met, the parallel run should be extended, and additional remediation efforts should be undertaken. The go/no-go decision should be documented, with clear rationale for the decision. This ensures transparency and accountability in the migration process.
After a successful parallel run and go-live decision, the focus shifts to stabilizing the new ERP system and decommissioning the legacy system. This involves monitoring the new system closely for any issues that may arise in the production environment. A hypercare period should be established, with dedicated support teams available to address user queries and resolve issues promptly. The legacy system should be kept in a read-only mode for a defined period to allow for any final data reconciliation or reference. Once the new system is stable and all data has been successfully migrated, the legacy system can be decommissioned. This process should be carefully planned to ensure that no data is lost and that all business processes are fully supported by the new system. Post-migration reviews should be conducted to capture lessons learned and identify areas for improvement in future ERP projects.
Common questions on this topic. Talk to our team for anything specific to your business.
The duration of a parallel run varies depending on the complexity of the business processes and the number of modules involved. Typically, it spans at least one full accounting cycle, which can range from one to three months. More complex implementations may require longer periods to ensure thorough validation.
Critical data points include General Ledger balances, Accounts Payable and Receivable subledger balances, inventory counts, and key financial statements. These metrics are essential for ensuring financial accuracy and operational continuity.
Yes, many aspects of a parallel run can be automated, including data replication, reconciliation, and reporting. Automation improves accuracy and efficiency, allowing the project team to focus on analyzing discrepancies and resolving issues.
Skipping a parallel run increases the risk of data loss, financial discrepancies, and operational disruption. Without validation, issues in the new system may not be identified until after cutover, leading to costly remediation and potential business impact.
Discrepancies should be categorized by severity, with critical issues prioritized for immediate resolution. The root cause of each discrepancy should be investigated, and a defect management process should be used to track and resolve issues. Regular reviews with stakeholders ensure that progress is monitored and adjustments are made as needed.
While not all modules may require a full parallel run, core financial and operational modules should be included. The scope of the parallel run should be determined based on the criticality of the modules and the risk associated with their migration.
Learn how to implement ERP process governance in professional services to align project delivery with revenue recognition, ensuring financial accuracy and operational consistency.
A practical guide to migrating CRM and sales pipeline data in Odoo, covering data profiling, mapping, validation, and risk mitigation for successful upgrades.
Discover how construction firms can modernize ERP systems to unify multi-project reporting, enhance cash flow visibility, and standardize financial controls across complex job sites.
Discuss your workflows, modules and deployment options with our team.
Back to resources