Connected business operations. Flexible deployment.
Learn how to design, execute, and validate parallel run periods in ERP migrations to minimize risk, ensure data integrity, and maintain operational continuity during high-stakes system transitions.
A parallel run period is a critical phase in high-stakes ERP migrations where both the legacy and target ERP systems operate simultaneously for a defined duration. This approach allows organizations to validate data integrity, process accuracy, and system performance before fully committing to the new system. The primary goal is to minimize risk by ensuring that the target system can handle real-world business operations without disrupting ongoing business activities. During this period, transactions are processed in both systems, and results are compared to identify discrepancies. This method is particularly important for complex migrations involving custom modules, third-party integrations, and large datasets. The duration of the parallel run depends on the complexity of the migration, the volume of transactions, and the criticality of the business processes involved. Typically, it ranges from one to three months, but it can be shorter or longer based on specific project requirements. The key risks to control during this phase include data loss, reporting discrepancies, integration failures, and user adoption challenges. By carefully planning and executing the parallel run, organizations can ensure a smooth transition to the new ERP system while maintaining operational continuity.
Before initiating the parallel run, it is essential to define the scope and objectives of the migration project. This involves identifying the business processes, data entities, and integrations that will be included in the parallel run. The project team should establish clear success criteria, such as data accuracy thresholds, transaction processing times, and user acceptance rates. It is also important to define the roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders, including IT, finance, operations, and business units. A detailed project plan should be created, outlining the timeline, milestones, and dependencies. This plan should include a risk assessment, identifying potential issues and mitigation strategies. Additionally, a communication plan should be developed to keep all stakeholders informed about the progress of the parallel run and any issues that arise. The preparation phase also involves setting up the necessary infrastructure, including staging environments, data synchronization tools, and monitoring systems. These tools will be used to track the performance of both systems and identify discrepancies in real-time.
Success criteria are the measurable standards that determine whether the parallel run has been successful. These criteria should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). For example, data accuracy should be at least 99.9%, transaction processing times should be within 10% of the legacy system, and user acceptance rates should be above 90%. These criteria should be agreed upon by all stakeholders before the parallel run begins. They will be used to evaluate the performance of the target system and determine whether it is ready for go-live. If the success criteria are not met, the project team should investigate the root causes and take corrective actions before proceeding to the next phase.
Clear roles and responsibilities are essential for the success of the parallel run. The project manager should oversee the overall progress and coordinate between different teams. The IT team should be responsible for setting up and maintaining the infrastructure, including data synchronization tools and monitoring systems. The finance team should be responsible for validating financial data and reporting. The operations team should be responsible for validating business processes and user adoption. The business units should be responsible for providing feedback and reporting any issues. A RACI matrix (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) should be created to clarify the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder. This will help ensure that everyone knows what is expected of them and can work together effectively.
The technical execution of the parallel run involves setting up data synchronization between the legacy and target systems. This ensures that both systems have the same data, allowing for accurate comparison of results. Data synchronization can be achieved through batch processing, real-time APIs, or middleware solutions. The choice of method depends on the volume of data, the frequency of transactions, and the complexity of the integrations. It is important to test the data synchronization process thoroughly before starting the parallel run. This includes testing data mapping, transformation, and validation. Any issues identified during testing should be resolved before the parallel run begins. Additionally, integration testing should be performed to ensure that all third-party systems, such as CRM, e-commerce, and supply chain management, are working correctly with the target ERP system. This includes testing data flows, error handling, and retry mechanisms.
There are several methods for synchronizing data between the legacy and target systems. Batch processing is suitable for large volumes of data that do not require real-time updates. It involves transferring data in scheduled intervals, such as daily or weekly. Real-time APIs are suitable for transactions that require immediate updates, such as sales orders and inventory movements. Middleware solutions can be used to manage complex data flows and transformations between multiple systems. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, and the choice should be based on the specific requirements of the migration project. It is important to document the data synchronization process, including the data mapping, transformation rules, and validation checks. This documentation will be used to troubleshoot any issues that arise during the parallel run.
Integration testing is a critical part of the technical execution phase. It involves testing the interactions between the target ERP system and all third-party systems. This includes testing data flows, error handling, and retry mechanisms. The goal is to ensure that all integrations are working correctly and that data is being transferred accurately and in a timely manner. Integration testing should be performed in a staging environment that mirrors the production environment. This allows for realistic testing without affecting live business operations. Any issues identified during integration testing should be resolved before the parallel run begins. It is also important to monitor the integrations during the parallel run to identify any issues that arise in real-time.
The validation phase involves comparing the results from the legacy and target systems to identify any discrepancies. This includes data reconciliation, reporting validation, and performance benchmarking. Data reconciliation involves comparing key data entities, such as customers, vendors, products, and transactions, between the two systems. Any discrepancies should be investigated and resolved. Reporting validation involves comparing financial reports, operational reports, and management reports generated by both systems. The goal is to ensure that the target system is producing accurate and reliable reports. Performance benchmarking involves comparing the performance of the two systems, including transaction processing times, system response times, and resource utilization. The goal is to ensure that the target system is performing at least as well as the legacy system. Any issues identified during the validation phase should be documented and tracked until they are resolved.
Data reconciliation is a critical part of the validation phase. It involves comparing key data entities between the legacy and target systems to ensure that they are consistent. This includes comparing customer records, vendor records, product records, and transaction records. Any discrepancies should be investigated to determine the root cause. Common causes of discrepancies include data mapping errors, transformation errors, and synchronization delays. Once the root cause is identified, corrective actions should be taken to resolve the issue. It is important to document all discrepancies and their resolutions. This documentation will be used to improve the data migration process and to ensure that similar issues do not occur in the future.
Reporting validation is essential to ensure that the target system is producing accurate and reliable reports. This involves comparing financial reports, operational reports, and management reports generated by both systems. The goal is to identify any discrepancies in the reports and to determine the root cause. Common causes of reporting discrepancies include data mapping errors, calculation errors, and configuration errors. Once the root cause is identified, corrective actions should be taken to resolve the issue. It is important to involve the finance and operations teams in the reporting validation process. They have the expertise to identify discrepancies and to determine their impact on business operations.
The deployment phase involves making the go-live decision and executing the cutover. The go-live decision should be based on the results of the validation phase. If the success criteria are met, the project team should proceed with the cutover. If the success criteria are not met, the project team should investigate the root causes and take corrective actions before proceeding. The cutover involves switching from the legacy system to the target system. This includes stopping data synchronization, finalizing data migration, and enabling the target system for live business operations. The cutover should be planned carefully to minimize downtime and disruption to business operations. A detailed cutover plan should be created, outlining the steps, timing, and responsibilities. The cutover plan should include a rollback plan, in case the cutover is not successful.
The go-live decision should be based on a set of predefined criteria. These criteria should include data accuracy, reporting accuracy, performance, and user acceptance. For example, data accuracy should be at least 99.9%, reporting accuracy should be at least 99.5%, performance should be within 10% of the legacy system, and user acceptance rates should be above 90%. If these criteria are met, the project team should proceed with the go-live. If these criteria are not met, the project team should investigate the root causes and take corrective actions before proceeding. The go-live decision should be made by a cross-functional team, including IT, finance, operations, and business units. This ensures that all perspectives are considered and that the decision is well-informed.
The cutover execution involves switching from the legacy system to the target system. This includes stopping data synchronization, finalizing data migration, and enabling the target system for live business operations. The cutover should be planned carefully to minimize downtime and disruption to business operations. A detailed cutover plan should be created, outlining the steps, timing, and responsibilities. The cutover plan should include a rollback plan, in case the cutover is not successful. The rollback plan should outline the steps to revert to the legacy system, including data restoration and system configuration. The cutover should be executed during a low-activity period, such as a weekend or a holiday, to minimize the impact on business operations.
The stabilization phase involves providing post-go-live support and optimizing the target system. This includes monitoring system performance, resolving any issues that arise, and providing user support. The goal is to ensure that the target system is stable and that users are able to perform their tasks efficiently. The stabilization phase should last for at least one to three months, depending on the complexity of the migration. During this phase, the project team should track key performance indicators, such as system uptime, transaction processing times, and user satisfaction. Any issues identified during the stabilization phase should be documented and tracked until they are resolved. The project team should also conduct a post-implementation review to identify lessons learned and areas for improvement. This review should be used to improve future migration projects.
Post-go-live support is essential to ensure that the target system is stable and that users are able to perform their tasks efficiently. This includes monitoring system performance, resolving any issues that arise, and providing user support. The project team should establish a help desk to handle user queries and issues. The help desk should be staffed by experienced IT support personnel who are familiar with the target system. The project team should also monitor system performance using monitoring tools. These tools should track key performance indicators, such as system uptime, transaction processing times, and resource utilization. Any issues identified during monitoring should be investigated and resolved promptly.
System optimization involves improving the performance and functionality of the target system. This includes tuning database queries, optimizing system configurations, and implementing performance enhancements. The goal is to ensure that the target system is performing at its best and that it can handle the expected workload. System optimization should be based on the results of the performance benchmarking conducted during the validation phase. Any performance issues identified during the stabilization phase should be addressed through system optimization. The project team should also consider implementing additional features or functionalities that were not included in the initial migration. This can be done through phased rollouts or through custom development.
Risk management is a critical part of planning parallel run periods for high-stakes ERP migrations. Common challenges include data loss, reporting discrepancies, integration failures, and user adoption issues. To mitigate these risks, the project team should implement a comprehensive risk management plan. This plan should include risk identification, risk assessment, risk mitigation, and risk monitoring. Risk identification involves identifying potential risks that could impact the migration project. Risk assessment involves evaluating the likelihood and impact of each risk. Risk mitigation involves developing strategies to reduce the likelihood or impact of each risk. Risk monitoring involves tracking the status of each risk and taking corrective actions as needed. The project team should also establish a risk register to document all identified risks and their mitigation strategies.
Data loss is one of the most significant risks in ERP migrations. To prevent data loss, the project team should implement robust data backup and recovery procedures. This includes taking regular backups of the legacy system and the target system, and testing the restore process to ensure that backups can be restored successfully. The project team should also implement data validation checks to ensure that data is being transferred accurately. Any data discrepancies identified during the parallel run should be investigated and resolved promptly. It is also important to document all data migration activities to ensure that there is an audit trail of all data changes.
User adoption is a critical factor in the success of an ERP migration. To address user adoption challenges, the project team should implement a comprehensive change management plan. This plan should include user training, communication, and support. User training should be provided to all users before the parallel run begins. The training should cover the new system's features, functionalities, and processes. Communication should be used to keep users informed about the progress of the migration and any changes that will be made. Support should be provided to users during the parallel run and after go-live. The project team should also gather feedback from users to identify any issues or areas for improvement.
Monitoring key metrics is essential to track the progress of the parallel run and to identify any issues that arise. Key metrics include data accuracy, reporting accuracy, performance, and user satisfaction. Data accuracy should be measured by comparing key data entities between the legacy and target systems. Reporting accuracy should be measured by comparing financial and operational reports generated by both systems. Performance should be measured by tracking transaction processing times, system response times, and resource utilization. User satisfaction should be measured through surveys and feedback sessions. These metrics should be tracked daily during the parallel run and reported to stakeholders on a regular basis. Any issues identified through monitoring should be investigated and resolved promptly.
| Metric | Description | Target | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Accuracy | Percentage of matching data entities between legacy and target systems | 99.9% | Daily |
| Reporting Accuracy | Percentage of matching reports between legacy and target systems | 99.5% | Weekly |
| Performance | Transaction processing times and system response times | Within 10% of legacy system | Daily |
| User Satisfaction | User feedback and survey results | Above 90% | Bi-weekly |
Planning parallel run periods for high-stakes ERP migrations requires careful preparation, technical execution, validation, deployment, and stabilization. By following the steps outlined in this article, organizations can minimize risk, ensure data integrity, and maintain operational continuity during the migration process. The key to a successful parallel run is to define clear success criteria, establish roles and responsibilities, implement robust data synchronization and integration testing, validate data and reporting accuracy, make an informed go-live decision, and provide post-go-live support and optimization. Risk management is also essential to mitigate common challenges such as data loss, reporting discrepancies, integration failures, and user adoption issues. By monitoring key metrics and tracking the progress of the parallel run, organizations can identify and resolve issues promptly, ensuring a smooth transition to the new ERP system. Ultimately, a well-planned and executed parallel run can help organizations achieve their migration goals while minimizing disruption to business operations.
Common questions on this topic. Talk to our team for anything specific to your business.
The typical duration of an ERP parallel run ranges from one to three months, depending on the complexity of the migration, the volume of transactions, and the criticality of the business processes involved.
Data reconciliation involves comparing key data entities, such as customers, vendors, products, and transactions, between the legacy and target systems. Any discrepancies should be investigated and resolved.
The main risks of a parallel run strategy include data loss, reporting discrepancies, integration failures, and user adoption challenges.
You should stop the parallel run and go live when the success criteria are met, such as data accuracy, reporting accuracy, performance, and user acceptance rates.
User resistance can be handled through a comprehensive change management plan, including user training, communication, and support.
Key metrics to track during the parallel run include data accuracy, reporting accuracy, performance, and user satisfaction.
Learn how to structure a manufacturing ERP to provide executives with real-time visibility into production efficiency, inventory accuracy, and cost performance, moving beyond static reports to actionable operational intelligence.
A practical guide for CIOs and ERP consultants on identifying, mapping, and resolving custom field dependencies in third-party Odoo modules during version upgrades to ensure data integrity and operational continuity.
Transform professional services operations by treating ERP as an operating architecture. Learn how to standardize project accounting, resource allocation, and order-to-cash processes to achieve predictable delivery and financial visibility.
Discuss your workflows, modules and deployment options with our team.
Back to resources