Connected business operations. Flexible deployment.
A practical framework for CIOs and IT leaders to assess ERP systems during M&A, covering data integrity, custom code risks, integration complexity, and migration strategy.
Technical due diligence for acquired companies with diverse ERP landscapes involves a systematic assessment of the target company's enterprise resource planning systems to identify risks, costs, and opportunities for integration. This process is critical because ERP systems are the backbone of operational data, financial reporting, and business processes. The primary goal is to understand the current state of the ERP environment, including version compatibility, custom code dependencies, data quality, and integration complexity. Key risks to control include data loss during migration, broken customizations, unsupported dependencies, and integration failures that could disrupt operations. By conducting a thorough technical audit, CIOs and IT leaders can make informed decisions about whether to consolidate, replace, or maintain the acquired ERP systems, ensuring business continuity and long-term maintainability.
The first step in technical due diligence is to define the scope of the assessment. This includes identifying all ERP systems in use, their versions, and the business units they support. It is essential to gather documentation such as system architecture diagrams, data flow maps, and integration inventories. If documentation is incomplete, which is common in acquired companies, the assessment must include interviews with key stakeholders and system administrators. The scope should also cover the hardware and software infrastructure supporting the ERP systems, including database servers, application servers, and middleware. This initial phase helps establish a baseline for the current state and identifies immediate gaps in knowledge or documentation.
Create a detailed inventory of all ERP systems, including the vendor, version, and deployment model (on-premise, cloud, or hybrid). Verify the current version against the vendor's official support documentation to determine if the system is still supported. Unsupported versions pose significant security and compliance risks. Additionally, identify any third-party add-ons or custom modules installed on the ERP system. These components may have their own compatibility requirements and support contracts that need to be reviewed. This inventory serves as the foundation for subsequent technical assessments.
Map the key business processes supported by the ERP systems, such as order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, and record-to-report. Understand how these processes are configured in the ERP and whether they rely on custom code or standard functionality. This mapping helps identify areas where the ERP system may be tightly coupled to specific business practices, which could complicate integration or migration. It also provides insight into the level of customization required to support the acquired company's operations, which is a critical factor in determining the feasibility of consolidation.
Data quality is a critical aspect of ERP technical due diligence. Poor data quality can lead to inaccurate reporting, operational inefficiencies, and compliance issues. The assessment should include data profiling to identify issues such as missing values, duplicates, inconsistent formats, and orphaned records. Data lineage analysis is also important to understand how data flows from source systems to the ERP and how it is transformed along the way. This analysis helps identify potential data loss or corruption risks during migration. Additionally, assess the data retention policies and archival strategies to ensure that historical data is preserved and accessible as required by regulatory or business needs.
Use data profiling tools to analyze the ERP database for quality issues. Focus on key entities such as customers, suppliers, products, and financial transactions. Identify the extent of data cleansing required before migration. This may involve deduplication, standardization of formats, and validation of referential integrity. The cost and effort of data cleansing should be factored into the overall migration budget. It is also important to establish data ownership and accountability for the cleansing process, ensuring that business users are involved in validating the cleaned data.
Trace the flow of data from source systems to the ERP and identify any transformations or mappings applied along the way. This analysis helps understand the dependencies between systems and the potential impact of changes to the data structure. It also helps identify any hidden business rules or logic embedded in the data transformation process, which may need to be replicated in the target system. This step is crucial for ensuring that the migrated data accurately reflects the business reality and that reporting remains consistent.
Custom code and third-party modules are often the most complex and risky components of an ERP system. The assessment should include a detailed review of all custom code, including its purpose, dependencies, and integration points. Identify any deprecated APIs or features that may not be supported in the target ERP version. This requires a thorough code review and, if possible, automated static analysis to detect potential issues. Additionally, assess the dependencies between custom modules and standard ERP functionality. This helps identify any potential conflicts or incompatibilities that could arise during migration or integration.
Conduct a code review of all custom modules to understand their functionality and dependencies. Use static analysis tools to detect potential issues such as deprecated API usage, security vulnerabilities, and performance bottlenecks. This review should be performed by experienced ERP developers who are familiar with the specific ERP platform. The findings of the code review should be documented and used to inform the migration strategy. If the custom code is too complex or risky to migrate, consider replacing it with standard functionality or third-party solutions.
Map the dependencies between custom modules and standard ERP functionality. Identify any modules that rely on specific ERP features or configurations. This mapping helps identify potential conflicts or incompatibilities that could arise during migration or integration. It also helps prioritize the migration of custom modules, ensuring that critical dependencies are addressed first. This step is crucial for ensuring that the migrated system functions as expected and that business processes are not disrupted.
ERP systems are rarely standalone; they are typically integrated with other systems such as CRM, WMS, and BI tools. The assessment should include a detailed inventory of all integrations, including the type of integration (API, file-based, middleware), the data exchanged, and the frequency of data exchange. Identify any custom APIs or middleware components that may need to be reconfigured or replaced. Additionally, assess the security of the integrations, including authentication, authorization, and data encryption. This assessment helps identify potential integration failures and security risks that could impact business operations.
Create a detailed inventory of all integrations, including the source and target systems, the type of integration, and the data exchanged. Document the data contracts, including the format, structure, and validation rules for the data. This documentation helps ensure that the integrations are accurately replicated in the target environment. It also helps identify any potential data loss or corruption risks during migration. Additionally, assess the error handling and retry mechanisms in place for the integrations, ensuring that failures are properly managed and reported.
Review the security of the integrations, including authentication, authorization, and data encryption. Ensure that the integrations comply with the organization's security policies and regulatory requirements. Identify any potential security vulnerabilities, such as weak authentication mechanisms or unencrypted data transmission. This review helps ensure that the migrated integrations are secure and that sensitive data is protected. Additionally, assess the monitoring and logging capabilities of the integrations, ensuring that failures and anomalies are properly detected and reported.
The infrastructure supporting the ERP systems, including hardware, software, and network, must be assessed to ensure it can support the integrated environment. This includes evaluating the capacity, performance, and scalability of the infrastructure. Identify any potential bottlenecks or single points of failure that could impact system availability. Additionally, assess the performance of the ERP systems under normal and peak loads, identifying any performance regressions or bottlenecks. This evaluation helps ensure that the integrated environment can support the combined workload of the acquired and acquiring companies.
Evaluate the capacity of the infrastructure to support the combined workload of the acquired and acquiring companies. This includes assessing the CPU, memory, storage, and network bandwidth requirements. Identify any potential bottlenecks or single points of failure that could impact system availability. Additionally, assess the scalability of the infrastructure, ensuring that it can handle future growth and changes in workload. This assessment helps ensure that the integrated environment is robust and can support the organization's long-term needs.
Conduct performance benchmarking of the ERP systems under normal and peak loads. Identify any performance regressions or bottlenecks that could impact user experience or business operations. This benchmarking should include key business processes, such as order entry, invoice processing, and reporting. The results of the benchmarking should be used to inform the migration strategy, ensuring that the target environment can support the required performance levels. Additionally, identify any performance tuning opportunities that can be implemented to improve system performance.
Based on the findings of the technical due diligence, develop a risk mitigation and migration strategy. This strategy should address the key risks identified, such as data loss, broken customizations, and integration failures. It should also outline the approach for consolidating, replacing, or maintaining the acquired ERP systems. The strategy should include a detailed plan for data migration, custom code migration, and integration reconfiguration. Additionally, it should include a testing plan, including unit tests, integration tests, and user acceptance tests, to ensure that the migrated system functions as expected. The strategy should also include a rollback plan, ensuring that the organization can revert to the previous state if the migration fails.
Develop a risk mitigation plan that addresses the key risks identified in the technical due diligence. This plan should include specific actions to mitigate each risk, such as data cleansing, custom code refactoring, and integration reconfiguration. It should also include a risk register, tracking the status of each risk and the actions taken to mitigate it. The risk mitigation plan should be reviewed and updated regularly as the migration progresses. Additionally, it should include a communication plan, ensuring that all stakeholders are aware of the risks and the actions being taken to mitigate them.
Develop a detailed migration and testing plan that outlines the steps for migrating the ERP systems and testing the migrated environment. This plan should include a data migration plan, a custom code migration plan, and an integration reconfiguration plan. It should also include a testing plan, including unit tests, integration tests, and user acceptance tests. The testing plan should include specific test cases and acceptance criteria, ensuring that the migrated system functions as expected. Additionally, it should include a rollback plan, ensuring that the organization can revert to the previous state if the migration fails.
After the migration is complete, the focus shifts to post-migration stabilization and support. This includes monitoring the system for any issues, providing user support, and addressing any defects or performance issues that arise. It is important to establish a hypercare period, during which the migration team provides intensive support to ensure that the system is stable and that users are comfortable with the new environment. Additionally, it is important to conduct a post-migration review, identifying any lessons learned and areas for improvement. This review helps ensure that the organization is prepared for future migrations or upgrades.
Establish a hypercare period, during which the migration team provides intensive support to ensure that the system is stable and that users are comfortable with the new environment. This period typically lasts for a few weeks after go-live and includes daily check-ins with key users and stakeholders. The hypercare team should be available to address any issues that arise, including defects, performance issues, and user questions. Additionally, it is important to provide training and support to users, ensuring that they are comfortable with the new system and that they understand any changes to business processes.
Conduct a post-migration review, identifying any lessons learned and areas for improvement. This review should include an assessment of the migration process, the testing process, and the post-migration support. It should also include an assessment of the system's performance and stability, identifying any issues that need to be addressed. The findings of the review should be documented and used to inform future migrations or upgrades. Additionally, it is important to celebrate the success of the migration and recognize the contributions of the migration team.
Common questions on this topic. Talk to our team for anything specific to your business.
Key risks include data loss, broken customizations, unsupported dependencies, integration failures, and security vulnerabilities. These risks can lead to operational disruptions, financial losses, and compliance issues.
Assess compatibility by reviewing the vendor's official documentation for the source and target versions. Check for deprecated features, API changes, and database schema differences. Conduct a code review to identify any custom code that relies on deprecated features.
The first step is to define the scope of the assessment and gather documentation such as system architecture diagrams, data flow maps, and integration inventories. If documentation is incomplete, conduct interviews with key stakeholders and system administrators.
The duration depends on the complexity of the ERP landscape. A simple assessment may take a few weeks, while a complex assessment with multiple systems and custom code may take several months.
Data profiling tools such as Talend, Informatica, and Alteryx are commonly used. These tools help identify data quality issues such as missing values, duplicates, and inconsistent formats.
Custom modules should be reviewed for dependencies and compatibility with the target ERP version. If the custom code is too complex or risky to migrate, consider replacing it with standard functionality or third-party solutions.
Learn how to transform raw manufacturing data into actionable ERP reporting intelligence. This guide covers capacity planning, cost visibility, and the architectural decisions needed to support faster, data-driven operational decisions.
A practical guide for CIOs and ERP consultants on resolving time-zone conflicts and fiscal calendar mismatches during global ERP migrations to ensure data integrity and financial accuracy.
Learn how to design a professional services ERP architecture that governs time, expense, and revenue across multiple legal entities, ensuring financial integrity and operational scalability.
Discuss your workflows, modules and deployment options with our team.
Back to resources