Connected business operations. Flexible deployment.
Learn how parallel running validates data integrity and process continuity during ERP migrations, reducing cutover risks and ensuring operational stability.
Parallel running is the practice of operating both the legacy ERP system and the new target system simultaneously for a defined period before fully decommissioning the old platform. This approach directly reduces migration risk by validating data integrity, process accuracy, and system performance in a live operational environment. It allows organizations to identify discrepancies in financial reporting, inventory levels, and customer data before the final cutover. The primary risks controlled through parallel running include data loss, broken customizations, integration failures, and operational downtime. By comparing outputs from both systems, IT and business teams can verify that the new ERP handles real-world transactions correctly. This validation phase is essential for ensuring that the migration meets business continuity requirements and that stakeholders have confidence in the new system's reliability. Without parallel running, organizations face higher uncertainty during cutover, potentially leading to costly post-go-live fixes and operational disruptions.
Before initiating parallel running, the project team must define the scope, duration, and success criteria. This involves identifying which business processes will be tested, such as order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, or inventory management. The team should establish measurable metrics for data reconciliation, such as variance thresholds for financial balances and transaction counts. Responsible roles include the ERP project manager, IT director, finance leader, and operations manager. Dependencies include a stable staging environment that mirrors production, complete data migration, and configured integrations. Decision criteria for starting parallel running should include successful completion of user acceptance testing (UAT) and resolution of critical defects. The preparation phase also requires communication planning to inform users that they will be entering data into both systems, which can increase workload and potential for error.
Reconciliation metrics are the core of parallel running validation. These metrics should cover financial data, such as general ledger balances, accounts payable, and accounts receivable. Operational data, including inventory levels, purchase orders, and sales orders, must also be compared. The team should define acceptable variance limits, such as a 0.1% difference in financial totals. Any variance exceeding the threshold triggers an investigation to identify the root cause, whether it is a data mapping error, a configuration issue, or a process difference. Documenting these metrics ensures that the validation process is objective and repeatable. It also provides a clear basis for the go/no-go decision at the end of the parallel running period.
During parallel running, data must be synchronized between the legacy and target systems to ensure that both platforms operate on the same dataset. This can be achieved through automated data feeds, manual exports and imports, or middleware solutions. The technical team must monitor data flows for errors, delays, or inconsistencies. Integration points, such as APIs connecting the ERP to CRM, e-commerce, or logistics systems, must be tested to ensure that data is transmitted correctly to both systems. Custom modules and third-party add-ons must be verified to function correctly in the new environment. The team should log all technical issues, including error messages, failed transactions, and performance bottlenecks. This log serves as a critical input for defect triage and resolution before cutover.
Parallel running provides an opportunity to benchmark the performance of the new ERP system under real-world load. The IT team should monitor key performance indicators, such as transaction response times, batch job completion times, and system uptime. Performance regressions, such as slower report generation or delayed invoice processing, must be identified and addressed. The team should compare performance metrics against the legacy system to ensure that the new platform meets or exceeds existing standards. If performance issues are detected, the team should work with the vendor or system integrator to optimize configurations, index databases, or adjust hardware resources. This proactive approach prevents performance-related disruptions during the final cutover.
The validation phase involves systematically comparing data and outputs from both systems. The finance team should reconcile general ledger balances, while the operations team should verify inventory and order data. Discrepancies must be categorized by severity, with critical issues requiring immediate resolution. The team should analyze the root cause of each discrepancy, determining whether it is due to data migration errors, configuration differences, or process changes. For example, a difference in tax calculations may indicate a configuration error in the new system, while a variance in inventory levels may point to a data mapping issue. The team should document all findings and track the resolution of each issue. This process ensures that the new system is accurate and reliable before it becomes the sole source of truth.
| Validation Area | Key Metrics | Responsible Role | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Data | GL Balances, AP/AR Totals | Finance Leader | Variance < 0.1% |
| Inventory | Stock Levels, Valuation | Operations Manager | 100% Match |
| Sales Orders | Order Count, Value | Sales Director | Variance < 0.5% |
| Integrations | API Success Rate | IT Director | 99.9% Success |
Once parallel running is complete and all critical issues are resolved, the team can proceed with the final cutover. The cutover plan should include a detailed runbook with step-by-step instructions, ownership assignments, and timing for each task. The freeze window, during which no changes are made to the systems, should be defined to ensure stability. Final data loads, such as opening balances and pending transactions, must be executed and verified. The go/no-go decision should be based on the completion of all validation criteria, including data reconciliation, performance benchmarks, and user acceptance. The team should communicate the cutover schedule to all stakeholders, including users, vendors, and customers. A rollback plan must be approved and tested, ensuring that the organization can revert to the legacy system if critical issues arise during cutover.
The go/no-go decision is a critical milestone in the migration project. Criteria for a 'go' decision should include successful completion of parallel running, resolution of all critical defects, and sign-off from key stakeholders. The team should review the reconciliation reports, performance metrics, and user feedback to make an informed decision. If any critical issues remain unresolved, the team should consider a 'no-go' decision and delay the cutover. This decision should be made by a cross-functional team, including the project manager, IT director, and business leaders. Documenting the decision and its rationale ensures transparency and accountability. It also provides a clear basis for any post-cutover actions, such as additional testing or remediation.
After the cutover, the organization enters the stabilization phase, where the focus shifts to monitoring the new system and addressing any emerging issues. The IT team should provide hypercare support, with dedicated resources available to resolve user queries and technical problems. The team should monitor system performance, data integrity, and user adoption metrics. Any discrepancies or errors reported by users must be investigated and resolved promptly. The team should also conduct post-implementation reviews to identify lessons learned and areas for improvement. This phase is crucial for ensuring that the new ERP system delivers the expected benefits and that users are comfortable with the new processes. The stabilization period typically lasts several weeks, during which the team gradually reduces support levels as the system stabilizes.
Parallel running is not without its challenges. One common risk is user fatigue, as employees must enter data into both systems, which can lead to errors and decreased productivity. To mitigate this, the team should provide clear instructions and training, and consider automating data entry where possible. Another risk is data inconsistency, which can occur if data is not synchronized correctly between the two systems. The team should implement robust data validation checks and monitor data flows closely. Performance issues, such as slower response times in the new system, can also arise. The team should benchmark performance during parallel running and address any regressions before cutover. Finally, the team must ensure that security configurations are correct in the new system, preventing unauthorized access or data breaches.
To maximize the benefits of parallel running, organizations should follow several best practices. First, define clear objectives and success criteria before starting the phase. Second, ensure that the staging environment is a true replica of the production environment, including data, configurations, and integrations. Third, involve key stakeholders from all departments in the validation process, ensuring that business processes are tested from multiple perspectives. Fourth, use automated tools for data reconciliation and monitoring, reducing the manual effort required and improving accuracy. Fifth, maintain open communication with users, providing regular updates on progress and addressing concerns promptly. Finally, document all findings and decisions, creating a comprehensive record that can be used for future migrations or audits.
Parallel running is a vital component of a successful ERP migration strategy. By validating data integrity, process accuracy, and system performance in a live environment, organizations can significantly reduce the risks associated with cutover. The process requires careful planning, technical execution, and rigorous validation, involving cross-functional teams and clear communication. While it adds time and cost to the project, the benefits of reduced risk and increased confidence in the new system far outweigh the drawbacks. Organizations that invest in thorough parallel running are better positioned to achieve a smooth transition to their new ERP system, ensuring operational continuity and long-term success.
Common questions on this topic. Talk to our team for anything specific to your business.
Parallel running is the practice of operating both the legacy and new ERP systems simultaneously to validate data and processes before final cutover.
The duration depends on the complexity of the migration, typically ranging from two to eight weeks, covering at least one full business cycle.
Skipping parallel running increases the risk of undetected data errors, process failures, and performance issues, leading to costly post-go-live disruptions.
Data reconciliation involves comparing key metrics, such as financial balances and inventory levels, between both systems and investigating any variances.
Yes, data synchronization and reconciliation can be automated using middleware and scripts, reducing manual effort and improving accuracy.
Success is indicated by minimal data variances, stable system performance, and positive user feedback, meeting predefined acceptance criteria.
A practical guide for CIOs and IT leaders on securing ERP migrations. Learn how to manage access controls, protect sensitive data, and ensure compliance during system upgrades or replacements.
Learn how to design a Professional Services ERP architecture that balances regional autonomy with centralized governance, ensuring scalable financial control and operational visibility across multiple practices.
Learn how to stabilize and optimize ERP performance post-migration. This guide covers database tuning, index management, query optimization, and monitoring strategies to ensure operational continuity and efficiency.
Discuss your workflows, modules and deployment options with our team.
Back to resources